सेन्ट जेविएर, रातो बङला मा पढ्ने लाई किन सामान्य स्कुल को भन्दा बढी इज्जत दिन्छ हाम्रो समाज ले? के उनिहरु साची नै देश कै लागि तेती महत्वपूर्ण साबित भएका छन? के उनिहरुको योग्दान महेन्द्र माद्यामिक वा रातामाते स्कुल बाट पढ्ने को भन्दा साची नै बढी छ नेपाली समाज मा? के उनिहरुको देश प्रतिको माया अरुको भन्दा बढी छ? आखिर के गरेका छन उनिहरुले देश को लागि जस्को कारण ले नेपाली समाज ले त्यहाँ पढ्नेलाई बेग्लाई पर्स्पेक्तिव बाट हेर्छ?    

Lets face it..These people are still rulling Nepal and look where Nepal is..I have no hard feelings for government college..Ma pani govt college mai padheko ho,govt job pani khayeko ho..Tara change lyauna ko lai change managent haina "CHANGE of MaNAGEMET " chahindo rahecha..3 Years ko govt jagir ko dherai namitho anubhav chha mero..Gorkhe sachib haru,dhusi pareko anuhar laaune Sakha Adhikrit haru..Hukke subba haru, chilime kharidar haru sabai jaso govt college ko product haru hun..Jo capable thiye (Of course hami haru) , we didnt have the courage to work against the system and we are here in this freakin country hoping that someday nepal will be prosperous..Mujhi hami haru, Jo Garna sakchhan thiye tiniharu sabai palayen bhaye pachhi , bhtra ko sytem change hunchha...Bottomline..affno ghar bhitra pasera phohor safa garna man lagdo rahenachha...

I just hate myself and ma jasta haru lai jo sajha ma basera thulo thula comment ta lekchhaun tara Pharkera phohor safe garne sahas batullna sakdainu...

Yes, the current Nepal is the outcome of Government school educated people. What a sattire! 
Private educated harulai pani ali ali corruption garney chance dinu paryo ni.
Khai chance nai didaina Nepal develop garna. Garna khojyo bhane jaha pani government educated lai bribe dida dida hairan.

doesn't matter where u study, depends on ur ability. however, i think, most private/boarding schools in Nepal are opened for business not to develop or prepare a nepalese to survive in today's market.

someone told me this:

difference between good schools and not so good schools is,

"average students of good schools are always better than average students from not so good school.  however, the best can come from any school".  meaning, average students of MIT are definitely better than average students from other average schools from here or else where.  however, the best in MIT is not necessarily the best overall.  i agree with this statement.

therefore, kathcat might be very good student from not so good school in nepal and able to show his potential when he/she got an opportunity.  however, not all students who go to some schools in village with lack of qualified teachers will be able to compete in this competitive environment.  Very good students will always excel, but we have to think about overall student's performance.  we can not take a single example and generalize which school is good or bad.  i am sure many students from rural area in nepal who do not have good exposure can perform well if given an opportunity.  however, it is not wise to say that average student from some rural school can compete with average student from top school in kathmandu.  many students from rural area can not even afford to go to school or college after slc.  They have to find a job to support their eduation.  in such situation, it is very difficult to compete with one who has strong background in school and all the facility needed to perform well.  its not only about who is more talent, it is also about opportunity.  talent can come from any part of the society, but opportunity are there only for those who can afford it.  i am sure there are thousands and thousands of students from rural area who can do very well if they are given opportunity but they dont have such opportunities.  It is also wrong to think superior just because one goes to certain elite school in nepal.  It is not only because of your talent, it has to do with your guardian's capacity to spend money on education.      

AAAA,
Good and balanced comment on this thread.

Maybe I read in a preceeding post, or heard it on TV lastnite, but here's something worth considering. People peak at different ages. The example cited was that of HS Prom Kings and Queens, who are at the peak of their popularity when they are 16 or thereabouts. How many of these Kings and Queens still remain popular during college and into the future? Hardly any. Same with early achievers. Some kids are brilliant at school, some find their 'bodhi_gyan' in college, yet others are struggling to find it throughout their careers and marriages etc.

Some STX, BKNS etc (and now Rato Bangla??) kids peaked when they were there. Whatever happened to the ones that were just roll-numbers in schools? I am at Sajha. The early peaks are now virtually lost in their early glory, which hasn't taken them much anywhere.

StX or not, it is not the school that matters, and as Ka BRB said, a lot depends on the teachers, environment, and the students' hard work and motivation. Striking the right balance is the tricky bit. Many eons ago, there was (and maybe there still is) a school in Janakpur Anchal, BastiPur Ma Vi, whose alumni make the Who's Who of Nepal. It was before StX/BKNS and after Durbar HS. There was something just right about Bastipur in those days. It produced the future doctors, engineers, thinkers, teachers, bankers, lawyers, politicians.. and farmers (and the JTTM). There are many more schools in Nepal like that, and there will always be.

As I said on a different thread, it is not StX or BKNS that determines one's destiny. Rather it is one's own willingness to take risks, challenges, and be passionate about what they do. Some learn these tricks in their family, others develop these skills in schools. And some schools are better than others at providing opportunities for these skills. Still some couldn't be bothered at all. But the measure should be 'what is that person giving back to the society?'

Yeah, 'what have you, from whatever school you are from, have you given back to the society, to the humankind?'

_x

लेख्न त धेरै कुरा मन थ्यो, अल्छि लाग्यो । के बेकारको कुरामा दिमागलाइ दुख दिने भनेर। :)

A4, I 100% agree with you. But somepeople from these elite or popular school  has this "ego" problem and think as if they are invincible and the best than the rest.

As you said  "its not only about who is more talent, it is also about opportunity.  talent can come from any part of the society, but opportunity are there only for those who can afford it " To elaborate on the issue of affordability, one should understand it is not only the issue of tuition fee, for rural people,  cost of living should be also taken into account, like you do in US. They often miss this point and continuously argue some of these schools are affordable, but they do  not realize it is affordable to those only who live in KTM city. 

 

Do people really give more respect to students of stx or ratob? The answer is relative.

It's like asking do people give more respect to people returning to Nepal from the US?

My answer is simply some do and some don't and it's their right to respect whoever they choose. It maybe the bheda attitude that makes people respect someone in supposedly good standing versus another in a supposedly bad or average standing. I think it's a natural phenomena. If you get to meet with Bill Gates you will probably be nicer to him and more respectful than if you met with a regular Joe working at starbucks.

If I was richer than Bill Gates I probably wouldn't give a shiet.

Axara,

"Some STX, BKNS etc (and now Rato Bangla??) kids peaked when they were there."

तपाइँले गाँठी कुरो गर्नुभो  । यसको उदाहरण म आफैं पनि हुँ  । स्कूल र कलेज पढदा राम्रै विद्यार्थीमा गनिन्थें तर अचेल यसै यता उता बताससँगै बहकिरहेको छु लक्ष्यविहीन चङ्गा सरी । तर अर्को के कुरो पनि सत्य हो भने सेन्ट जेभियर्स, सेन्ट मेरीज, बुढानीलकण्ठ, लिटल एन्जल्स, ग्यालेक्सी जस्ता स्कूलमा पढेका अधिकांश विद्यार्थीले भने जीवनमा केही गरी खाएकै छन । म जस्ता विद्यार्थीहरु अल्पसंख्यक नै छन । राजनीतिमा भने त्यति संलग्न छैनन किनभने नेपालमा राजनीति गर्नेहरुको बीजारोपण अझै पनि सरकारी कलेजमै हुने गरेको पाइन्छ । यसको कारण बारे भने मैले विश्लेषण गरेको छैन ।

पढ्ने मेलो राजधानीमा काम गर्दै पढ्ने युवकयुवतीको सङ्र्घष राजधानीको एक मध्याह्न चर्को घाम लागिरहेको छ । सडकमा पीँपीँ हर्न बजाउँदै गाडीहरू हुइँकिरहेका छन् । सोह्रखुट्टेको एउटा मोबाइल पसलमा दुई जना तन्नेरी काममा व्यस्त छन् । ग्राहकको भीड बढिरहेको छ । अर्की युवती ग्राहकलाई सामान दिन व्यस्त छिन् । उनीहरूको आँखैअगाडि फोहरको डङ्गुर थुप्रिएको छ । सबैले मास्क लगाएका छन् । उमेरले २१ वर्षा पाइला टेकेका लक्ष्मण भट्ट र राम भट्ट जुम्ल्याहा दाजुभाइ हुन् । अनुहार पनि मिल्दोजुल्दो छ । प्रायः एउटै पहिरनमा देखा पर्छन् उनीहरू । उच्च शिक्षा हासिल गर्न गोरखा, बोर्लाङबाट काठमाडौँ प्रवेश गरेको चार वर्षभयो । गणतन्त्रमार्गका नामले चिनिने आरआर क्याम्पसमा बीए दोस्रो वर्षा पढ्छन् दुवै जना । बुबाआमा कृषिमै निर्भर भएकाले काम नगरी सुखै थिएन । काठमाडौँ आएदेखि नै राम न्युरोडमा अर्काको मोबाइल पसलमा काम गर्थे भने लक्ष्मण एउटा पब्लिकेसनमा । डेढ वर्षेखि आफैँले पसल खोले । भन्छन्, "जे कुरा पनि आफँै गर्दा राम्रो हुन्छ । अर्काको पसलमा कति काम गर्नु -" बिहान ७ बजेदेखि रातीको १० बजेसम्म उनीहरू ब्रि्रेका मोबाइल बनाउने, हाउजिङ् फेर्ने, हेडफोन बेच्ने, सेटहरू बेच्ने र घडीहरू बेच्ने काममा व्यस्त हुन्छन् । दिउँसो काममा बहिनी तारा भट्टले पनि सघाउँछिन् । मनमोहन मेमोरयिल कलेजबाट 'प्लस टू'को पढाइ सिध्याइन् उनले । पसल चलाएकै भरमा यी दाजुबहिनीको पढाइ खर्च जुट्छ । कति कमाउँछन् होला मासिक रूपमा - लक्ष्मण भन्छन्, "लेख्नूस् सर पत्रकारको आँखाले कति देख्छ -" पसलको मासिक आठ हजार र कोठाको २ हजार ५ सय रुपियाँ तिररिहेका छन् भट्ट दाजुभाइ । BR>लोकबहादुर श्रेष्ठ, २०, संयुक्त पाटन बहुमुखी क्याम्पसका आईए दोस्रो वर्षा विद्यार्थी हुन् । राजधानीबाट नजिकै रहेको सिन्धुपाल्चोकमा छ उनको घर । बुबाआमा गाउँमा खेतीकिसानी गर्छन् । सिन्धुपाल्चोक, अर्तरपुरबाट राजधानी आएका लोकबहादुर नयाँबानेश्वरको एक रेस्टुराँमा वेटरको काम गर्छन् । तर, उनी आफ्‍नो अप्ठ्यारोबारे बोल्न चाहँदैनन् । उनी खाना होटलमै खान्छन्, २ हजार ५ सय रुपियाँ चोखो बचाउँछन् । यतिले कोठा भाडा र पढाइ खर्च चलाउन उनलाई पुगेकै छ । फूलबारी, ओखलढुङ्गाकी देवी लुइँटेल सुन्धाराको स्कुड एक्सप्रेसमा रिसेप्सनको काम गर्छिन् । दुई वर्षघि राजधानी आएकी लुइँटेलले त्यहीबेलादेखि नै थालेकी हुन् । महेन्द्ररत्न क्याम्पसमा बीए दोस्रो वर्षा अध्ययनरत लुइँटेलसँगै भाइ र बहिनी पनि बस्छन् । ड्रि्री गरेर छाड्ने धोको छ उनको । कापी-किताब र सामान्य खर्च आफ्नो कामबाट जुटाउने देवीले आफ्नो कमाइ भने बताइनन् । काठमाडौँ बस्दा कस्ता दुःखकष्ट यिनका पोल्टामा आए होलान् - भन्छिन्, "आफ्नो दुःख, वेदना अरूलाई सुनाएर के गर्नु - कसैले बुझ्दैनन् । जे छ, मनमै छ ।" ढिकुरा, अर्घाखाँचीका विनोद घिमिरे, २४, पुतलीसडकको स्टार इन्टरनेसनलमा मार्केटिङ् अफिसरका रूपमा काम गर्छन् । यहाँबाट ल्यापटप, कम्प्युटर, यूपीएस, सीडी, पेनडाइभजस्ता सामानहरू बिक्री हुन्छन् । र, ब्रि्रेका कम्प्युटर र ल्यापटप पनि मर्मत गरिन्छ । उनले सुरुमा कम्प्युटरका पाटपुर्जा पसलबाट मर्मत केन्द्रसम्म ल्याउने-लैजाने गर्थे । भन्छन्, "कामप्रति इमानदार र विश्वासिलो लागेपछि अहिले साहूजीले मार्केटिङ् अफिसर बनाइदिएका छन् ।" शङ्करदेव क्याम्पसमा बीबीएस दोस्रो वर्षा पढ्दैछन् विनोद । "सुरुसुरुमा काठमाडौँ आउँदा कोठाभाडा तिर्न सकिनँ । आफन्त साथीभाइसँग मागेर खर्च चलाएँ तर कति दिनसम्म यसरी चल्थ्यो र ! काम नगरी सुखै भएन," पुराना दिनहरू सम्झन्छन्, "दुःख नपाएको भए मिहिनेत पनि गरिँदैनथ्यो होला ।" २ हजार ५ सय रुपियाँबाट काम सुरु गरेका विनोदको तलब अहिले आठ हजार रुपियाँ पुगिसकेको छ । भाइबहिनीलाई पनि आफ्नै खर्चले पढाइरहेका छन् । राजधानीबाहिरबाट आएका थुप्रै आफूजस्तै साथीहरूलाई आफ्ना अनुभव सुनाउँछन् विनोद, "काठमाडौँमा काम पाउन गाह्रो छ तर आत्तिनु हुँदैन । विस्तारै दिन आउँछ । मिहिनेत गर्न छोड्नु हुन्न ।" पद्मकन्या क्याम्पसमा सोसल र्सर्भिस विषय लिएर बीए प्रथम वर्षा पढ्दैछिन् मीना पौडेल, २० । उनको घर जुकेना, अर्घाखाँची हो । बुबा गाउँमा मौरीपालन गर्छन् । घरबाट पठाएको पैसाले नपुग्ने भएपछि उनले यतै काम गर्न थालिन् । हाल बीएन पुस्तक संसार प्रकाशन गृहमा काम गररिहेकी छन्, मीना । यसअघि उनी विवेक सिर्जनशील प्रकाशनमा काम गर्थिन् । किताबहरू विभिन्न स्टेसनरी र स्कुलहरूमा पुर्‍याउने र लेखकहरूका रचना टाइप गर्ने उनको काम हुन्थ्यो । अहिले पनि उनको त्यही काम हो । सङ्र्घष गरेर पढिरहेकी यी युवतीको सपना कस्तो होला - भन्छिन्, "म विजनेसमै लाग्छु । र, एउटा ठूलो व्यापारी बन्छु । मीना दुःख गरेर चार हजार रुपियाँ कमाउँछिन् । मासिक १ हजार ५ सय रुपियाँ भाडा तिर्छिन् । दूरदराजबाट उच्च शिक्षा हासिल गर्न हरेक वर्षराजधानी आउनेहरूको ताँती लाग्छ । तीमध्ये अधिकांश मध्यम र निम्नवर्गीय परिवारका विद्यार्थीहरू छन् । पढाइ पूरा गर्न काम गर्नैपर्ने बाध्यता छ । दिनप्रतिदिन बढ्दै गएको महँगीको मार सबैभन्दा बढी विद्यार्थीले नै खेपिरहेका छन् । सुनौलो भविष्यको सपना बोकेर राजधानी आएका थुप्रै किशोरकिशोरी अभाव र सङ्र्घषको जीवन बाँचिरहेका छन् । गाउँबाटै प्लस टू गरेर छ वर्षघि राजधानी छिरेका हुन् बेतघारी, सोलुखुम्बुका बालकृष्ण कट्टेल, २५ । पढाइ पूरा गर्न कट्टेलले के मात्र गरेनन् - एयरपोर्टको ट्याक्सी काउन्टरमा बिल काट्ने, काठमाडौँ फन पार्कमा टिकट काट्ने, वसन्तपुरको नाइट मार्केटमा कपडा बेच्नुका साथै समय र हिमाल खबरपत्रिकाको मार्केटिङ् गरे । काठमाडौँमा सङ्र्घष गर्न थालेको छ वर्षभइसक्यो यद्यपि स्नातकोत्तर गर्ने उनको चाहना अधूरै छ । पीडा खोतल्छन्, "नियमित पढे त सकिन्थ्यो तर काम गर्नैपर्ने बाध्यता छ । कामको चापले पढ्नै पाइँदैन ।" महेन्द्ररत्न क्याम्पस ताहचलबाट बीए तेस्रो वर्षो परीक्षा दिएर बसेका कट्टेलको काँधमा अर्को जिम्मेवारी पनि थपिएको छ । भर्खरै प्लस टू गरेकी बहिनी पुष्पालाई पढाउनु छ । जैसीदेवलमा बस्दै आएका कट्टेल हाल बानेश्वरको एउटा कपडा पसलमा सेल्सम्यानको काम गररिहेका छन् । तलब छ मासिक चार हजार रुपियाँ । १ हजार ५ सय रुपियाँ कोठाभाडा तिरेर बाँकी खर्चको मेलोमेसो गर्नु छ । दुःखेसो पोख्छन्, "दिनप्रतिदिन महँगी बढेको बढ्यै छ । अरू चीजको महँगी बढ्छ तर हाम्रो तलब कहिल्यै बढ्दैन, बरु घट्छ ।" भविष्यमा के बन्ने सोचमा छन् त कट्टेल - "हामी तल्लो वर्गका मान्छे । लोकसेवा लडेर निजामती प्रशासनमा छिर्ने । यदि त्यो पनि सकिएन भने गाउँमै पढाउने ।" जागिर गर्दै पढ्ने विद्यार्थीहरू प्रायः बिहान र बेलुकी कक्षा लिन्छन् । अधिकांश स्नातक पढ्दै गरेका विद्यार्थीहरू जागिरे छन् । कतिपय होटल या पसलमा काम गर्छन् । कतिले मार्केटिङ् गर्छन् । सडकमै बसेर व्यापार गररिहेकाहरू पनि प्रशस्त छन् । विभिन्न प्रकृतिको काममा हात हालेकाहरू आफ्नो कामलाई गोप्य राख्न चाहन्छन् । आफ्‍नाबारेमा अरूलाई थाहा हुन्छ भन्ने डरले पनि हुनसक्छ । समाजशास्त्री डिल्लीराम दाहाल जागिरले विद्यार्थीको 'करिअर' निर्माणमा बाधा पुगिरहेको बताउँछन् । भन्छन्, "समाजमा यस्ता विद्यार्थीहरू उदाहरणको पात्र बन्न सक्छन् । यो आफैँमा सकारात्मक कुरा हो । मैले त्यस्ता धेरै विद्यार्थीहरू भेटेको छु, जो न त पूर्ण रूपले काम गर्न सक्छन्, न पढ्न नै सक्छन् ।"

katheyCAT ! oops kathCAT,

It would be nice if you would bother to address me as a "LahureDai" instead of "Lahure". Dont let other people to realize how well educated and respectful are you. Unlike me, your comments won enough plaudits from my fellow sajhaities for being decorous and pleasing ,so don't disenchant them by addressing me brusquely.Come on dude, you could be more courteous and urbane as you learned your manner from your surrounding and context :-)
 
kathCAT sir, I can see  the tone of truculence in your every comments. Every time when you reply me you go into a lengthy tirade, blaming us, Xavierians for having an ego. I dont have to tell you but I think it is worthy to repeat it again here : dont judge the book by looking at its cover, son. I agree, you might have been abased by few students of Xavier's, but that doesn't give you proper rights to strut on our name. That is the main reason why I am being so solicitous about this thread. Otherwise, I have better things to do than just replying mentally feeble and pharisee guy like you. The most fuuny yet asinine sh*t you did was that you wrote "you can not compare apple and oranges" . How come you forget  you were comparing  Dr. Upendra Devkota with Dr. Arun Baskota in your last comment. Just like St. Xavier's and other schools are good in their own perspective,  Dr. Devkota and Dr. Baskota are good in their own  respective field. Be stiff in your logic instead of being a recalcitrant ,so that its makes sense, dummy! what a crass this guy is!


AAAA and JharekoPaat,

Despite your busy time, thanks for stopping by and dropping your discerning thinking. I wholeheartedly respect that. Two thumbs up to AAAA and JharekoPaat.

Sarkozy,
We, majority of  Nepalese, are not Americanized yet.I consider myself a FOB in this alienated land, so I am assuming that every Nepalese are familiar with the scenario outlined by that newspaper article. Talking about me personally, that article is somewhat very quibble than what I have actually seen in real life. I know many folks in real life going through even  worse situation than depicted in that article, so that news is no surprise for me. I think it applies to all Nepalese.
BTW, I am not sure about my friend George, who has become a die-hard fan of sajha after Nas started uploading pictures of hot chicks. This news may be somewhat queer to him. I will try my best to explain him about the scenario portrayed in that newspaper article.



My main point is please stop making grimy jokes about one's identity. None should make a tediously dull  hypothesis just by judging few people.  We all human got equal brain that everybody's brain is divided into cerebrum, cerebellum and medulla oblangata, so it is up to us how we utilize it.

Thanks,

All i gotta say is, Lincoln is the best, then comes xaviers...right LD?

lily,

Lincoln could be the best school but its damn too expensive. My parents couldn't afford my education in Lincoln!

BTW, my last post was friggin too long, so I had to edit that and made very short!

sarkozy sathi, ramro article rakhnu bhayo tapaile, tapailai muri muri dhanyabaad....parishram garna chahane lai kasaile rokna sakdainan, dhani bau aama ka santaan haru je sukai garun.. tara ramrksihna, mina, binod, balkrishna ra devi jyu haru ko katha sunera ajha parishram garne jagar aayo!! waha haru sabai lai mero subhakamana sunaulo bhavisya ko lagi!

akhir kasaile thikai bhaneka raichan ......" kukkur bhukdai garcha, hatti lamkidai garcha"

Lauredai,

 

Some Excerpts from your comments

 

“We need brain to learn language...dont you? Probably you dont but I do.”

 

Being good at just one (English) language does not make you an intelligent. Chinese are giving hard time to US. Japanese are doing great. The both countries in Asia, one evolved out from world war-ii and one from civil war( communist) now, are in a strong postion in world economy than those of English speaking country.  What you need is the overall potential not just a command over a particular language. Agree?? Again I am not denouncing the importance of English. But some people feel so proud just because of they have good english which I find is absolutely stupid.

“You have to concur at the point that you got “typical villagers attitude”- later edited “typical stupid attitude”

 

What can I say about it?

 

“I know you are somewhere working in third class job and you are saying that you beat Xavierians,Marian, and other brilliant students. You are an avid fantasizer dude.”

Even I am working what you consider third class job, by now being in US, you should have learnt to respect the dignity of work at first place. As you are from very good school, father should have taught you that basic or did you miss that class? Yes I am a taxi driver and Janitor.

 

Once a villager told me this poem when I was a kid “ upakari guni byakti, nihurincha nirantara, faleko brikchya ko hango najhuke ko kahan chara”. I guess being SXV, you also would be good at Nepalese literature, if not; this is a piece of poem written by Kabi Siromani Lekhnath Paudyal.

 

Learn to respect all the professions, they all have important role to play in the society where you living and  enjoying all the contemporary facilities.

 

“There is no doubt  that we got more knowledge than you even though you keep on avowing that you are the man with high dexterity.”

 

No need to say you( as you said we SXV) got more knowledge everybody would have known by now.

 

 

“Oh my fkn god!” “nugatory sh*t!”- use this kind of word too often and expect respect from the others???? I do not know how to use it.

 

Coming back to my apple and oranges, in my all posting I did not say local schools ( as schools) are better than sxv, rb, or bnk and comparing those would be like comparing apple and oranges. But when it comes to the product, like the way you love to generalize ( fantasize in your own words, good that you hate fantasizer) “we got more knowledge”,  you just can not buddy! When it comes to product, it is completely upto individual’s potential. That was the reason why I gave example of you Dr. Devkota ( a typical villager) and Dr. Baskota ( very urbane). I do not think both are diamonds, Dr. Devkota is way ahead I guess you would also agree.

 

 

As you mentioned in your earlier postiings SXvV, BKNL get/got admission in IVY Leagues more than the others, unfortunately facts stands on contrary to your fantasy. Just go and find data on Ivy League colleges how many SXV got there and how many non SXV got there. Like I said you would be disappointed. So I do not know who is fantasizing here!

 

 

 Oh yeah this is for your wisdom, Kul Chandra Gautam” –former assistant general secretary of UN (highest rank any Nepalese got in UN), went to Princeton, he also happens to be a typical villager from GULMI district. Here is the link.

 

http://nepaleseingoettingen.blogspot.com/2007/12/kul-chandra-gautam-biography.html

 

Again, Dr. Ambika Prashad Adhikari, former chief of IUCN Nepal, and first Nepali go get PHD from Harvard, is also happens to be a typical villager from Bhojpur. Importantly not from SXV.

 

http://www.chautari.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=10987&mode=threaded

 

  

So I suggest you to do some research before drawing any hypothesis.

 

Oh yeah, I heard you love to cut me into 50pcs. Some one from shout box told me. Stay away from such defeated mentality, not good for health for a talent like you. Calm down!

Lahure Dai,
When I read your postings in this thread, I got reminded of the following quote by C.S. Lewis: "Don't use words too big for the subject. Don't say 'infinitely' when you mean 'very'; otherwise you'll have no word left when you want to talk about something really infinite." I don't mean and attempt to offend you but your overall writing and the way you present here reflects the attitude that this thread is really attempting to uncover: that the students of the so called elite school are hypocrite, verbose and showy. Sometimes, the use of verbosity does in fact have a political implication-- to use words as a weapon to rule over the common folks who don't understand without the help of a dictionary. Is that what you are trying to do? Is that the way you are trying to disengage your cult "XAVARIAN" with the rest of others?

Contrary to what you seem to believe, simple writing is not the product of "village attitude". A simple, unpretentious style has both grace and power. By not calling attention to itself, it allows the reader to focus on the message. I would not unnecessarily preach you about the use of language here but since you "implied" so many time that you guys are really good in terms of English language, I tried to feel the "Xavarian" nerve! What do you want us to focus while we're reading your thread? Compel us to frequently turn dictionary? Let me drag some of your pretentious and pompous wordings which in fact reflect your Xavarian mentality:

plaudits
decorous
disenchant
brusquely
truculence
solicitous
recalcitrant
......many more

At the same time, see the context and consistency of such words: in no time he mixes the filthy four lettered words with the "Xavarian" words to make a lingual porridge (पिन्ड बनाउन ). Stop it boy! Did the Father instruct you to make सराद्धे of English this way?

Lahure Dai,
When I read your postings in this thread, I got reminded of the following quote by C.S. Lewis: "Don't use words too big for the subject. Don't say 'infinitely' when you mean 'very'; otherwise you'll have no word left when you want to talk about something really infinite." I don't mean and attempt to offend you but your overall writing and the way you present here reflects the attitude that this thread is really attempting to uncover: that the students of the so called elite school are hypocrite, verbose and showy. Sometimes, the use of verbosity does in fact have a political implication-- to use words as a weapon to rule over the common folks who don't understand without the help of a dictionary. Is that what you are trying to do? Is that the way you are trying to disengage your cult "XAVARIAN" with the rest of others?

Contrary to what you seem to believe, simple writing is not the product of "village attitude". A simple, unpretentious style has both grace and power. By not calling attention to itself, it allows the reader to focus on the message. I would not unnecessarily preach you about the use of language here but since you "implied" so many time that you guys are really good in terms of English language, I tried to feel the "Xavarian" nerve! What do you want us to focus while we're reading your thread? Compel us to frequently turn dictionary? Let me drag some of your pretentious and pompous wordings which in fact reflect your Xavarian mentality:

plaudits
decorous
disenchant
brusquely
truculence
solicitous
recalcitrant
......many more

At the same time, see the context and consistency of such words. Stop mixing up the filthy four lettered words with the "high sounding" words to make a lingual porridge (पिन्ड बनाउन ) in a way to do unholy सराद्धे of English. 

लाहुले दाई, हदुलको अङ्लेदी कती खतला लहेथ। हदुल बोदिङ इथ्कुल्मा पल्नुभा हो?