Headline is clear.

sponsor kaha bata khojne

I am wondering why is it not covering people who came legally here but became out of status, and then received TPS later on. Why is it only targeting people who came here illegally from border? This is setting such a bad precedent!

that’s new rule but still you must maintain status to get greencard from job sponsorship.this is only good for marriage based

Benn G buda Yo niyam sabailai lagoo huncha Not only undocumented. Nepal gayera aako chas … jadoo
Mantarr gardiyo Ki kya ho yeslai. Tetti ni bujhdainas. I am wondering po bhancha .

From USCIS policy alert:

USCIS is updating its guidance to clarify that TPS beneficiaries who travel abroad temporarily, with the prior consent of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS), and who return in accordance with that prior authorization, may be inspected and admitted into TPS upon return, with certain exceptions. TPS beneficiaries whom DHS has inspected and admitted into TPS after such authorized travel are “inspected and admitted” for purposes of adjustment of status under INA 245(a) and INA 245(k). This is true even if the TPS beneficiary was present without admission or parole when initially granted TPS.

So this applies to everyone regardless of past lawful entry. You just gotta find the sponsor. Good luck!

If that is the case then this is certainly a great news! This will very much help the people who are trying to adjust status in TPS but are not able to do so because of their past 'out of status' stays.

Hanuman  le galat bujhhechha.

Bennedict pani khusi bhayecha yo news sunera.

So TPS holders can apply for Greencard if they have sponsor? I didn't quite get it .I understood the illegal status being legal after re-entry. So when it will be finally announced ?

What about who enter first time legally ? Little confused?
ANY IDEAS?

Guys,

Bennedict pani yestai yestai situation ma jasto cha . 15 barsa pachi nepal gara aako bhancha ?? Katti year out of status thiyees bennedict

I hope everyone who is struggling gets their GC.

Benedict, I think you ought to look at INA 245(k). INA 245(k) states that —

(1) the alien, on the date of filing an application for adjustment of status, is present in the United States pursuant to a lawful admission;
(2) the alien, subsequent to such lawful admission has not, for an aggregate period exceeding 180 days-
(A) failed to maintain, continuously, a lawful status;
(B) engaged in unauthorized employment; or
(C) otherwise violated the terms and conditions of the alien's admission.

Now this means since the TPS travel would be considered as an ‘admission’ not ‘parole’ and if the applicant does not violate the terms of *this* admission they are eligible for AOS via EB.

Sql_server,

I feel this new policy alert may work for people who start the EB petition after they come back, but not for people whose EB petition is already running prior to TPS and who have had 'unlawful presence' in their past. — see policy highlights

From the policy alert — “Provides that USCIS may deem past travel under advance parole to have been an admission into TPS in certain cases.” This means it’s case by case basis. Best bet is to re-enter again on an AP.