[VIEWED 6336
TIMES]
|
SAVE! for ease of future access.
|
|
|
LorenzoBernini
Please log in to subscribe to LorenzoBernini's postings.
Posted on 07-25-08 1:13
AM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
Hi all!
I was just thinking about the energy bill in a Nepalese house. Gas price --- we can't do anything about it. Its rising high like a balloon filled with hydrogen. Anyway, i was calculating and comparing the electricity bill in a house in America and Nepal.
We know that our circiut in Nepal uses 230 V input voltage and American uses 120 V .
Power = V2 /R Lets say we use a appliance with1000 Ohm in Nepal and America.
IN Nepal,
Power = (230)2/1000 = 52.9 Watt
Amount of Energy in one day (24 Hrs.) = 52.9 *24 = 1269.6 Wh = 1.27 KWh (KiloWattHr)
IN America,
Power = (120)2/1000 = 14.4 Watt
Amount of Energy in one day (24 Hrs.) = 14.4 *24 = 345.6 Wh = 0.345 KWh (KiloWattHr)
IF the electricity rate is $0.10 per KWh
Then, a Nepali pays : $0.10*1.27 = $ 0.127 = 12.7 Cents
And an American pays: $0.10*0.345 = $ 0.0345 = 3.45 Cents
So, Why are we paying expensive electric bill making our voltage 230 Volts? Why dont we make 120 Volts?
Is there anybody to figure this out? OR i am lost here!!
Last edited: 25-Jul-08 01:34 AM
|
|
|
|
uniscom
Please log in to subscribe to uniscom's postings.
Posted on 07-25-08 1:54
AM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
a well known formula,
P=V*I
so,if power for an applience is constant,
V*I=K(constant)
or, V ∞1/I
e.g. P=1000W
if V=200V,it will take 5A current
if V=100V,I will be 10 A
therefore,for a device having constant power consumption,if we decrease voltage,it will take more current.and ultimately power consumption will be same.
|
|
|
jungehaldar
Please log in to subscribe to jungehaldar's postings.
Posted on 07-25-08 4:10
AM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
i feel very bad about myself right now, laaz le mukh chopna man lagyo!
|
|
|
Helpless
Please log in to subscribe to Helpless's postings.
Posted on 07-25-08 5:25
AM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
uniscom formula is correct. Matter of fact, Lorenzobernini's assumption is wrong, most appliances are rated in Watts and not in Ohms. Therefore, take the example of a 20 Watt bulb.
P = VI
Since P = 20W and V = 230 V (Nepal rating)
Therefore, I = 20/230 = 0.087 A or 87 mA
V = 120 V (American rating)
Therefore, I = 20/120 = 0.167 A or 166.67 mA
Think of current (I) as water, so more the water, bigger the pipe needed. Therefore, more current, thicker conductor required, meaning more copper required. However the trade off is thinner the conductor, more support or poles are required. Since Nepal has more trees (for wooden poles) than copper, 230 V is a cheaper investment for Nepal than 120 V though 120V is likier to be a safer voltage to handle. Nevertheless, the voltage losses in 230 V is insignificant compared 120 V losses.
Futhermore, most asian countries use the 230 V rating. Therefore power distribution equipments (transformer, circuit breakers, generators) of 230 V ratings is more easily available to Nepal than 120 V equipements. That was problably why Nepal most likely choose the 230 V rating.
As for your electric bill comparison, an average American home is likely to consume more power than a home in Nepal. The major reason being, we are having close to 8 hours of load shedding per day for almost three months. With no fuel to power the generators, I think that consumption should be even lesser. Irony of it all, unless you are village with micro hydropower generation plant of your own, you are less likely to be dependent on electricy in Nepal.
|
|
|
piranha
Please log in to subscribe to piranha's postings.
Posted on 07-25-08 7:56
AM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
|
|
|
Stiffler
Please log in to subscribe to Stiffler's postings.
Posted on 07-25-08 10:02
AM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
I hope you didn’t publish a thesis on this. Going with your assumption, why don’t we just increase ampacity of the cable (increase current) and keep the voltage as low as 1 Volt; won’t it be real cheap? Why go with 120 volts?
Thank God for helpless giving him some help.
Question, don't we have 240 volts instead of 230?
|
|
|
Poon-Hill
Please log in to subscribe to Poon-Hill's postings.
Posted on 07-25-08 10:27
AM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
I was wondering is there are any coal mines in Nepal from which we can generate electricity. I was in Wyoming for a trip. and i foud like atleast eight dams from Casper till the boarder of Nebraska. What surprised me that these dams with hydro-electricity generators contributes very less like only 15% to the demand of electricity. They do have quite a few modern wind turbines in use, but still they are highly dependent on coals. This made me thinking "How is the coal situation in our country". Not that i wanna exploit our natural resources and pollute atmosphere more, but just outta cuorosity.
P.S: Not trying to be a SMARTASS. Have a good weekend.
|
|
|
LorenzoBernini
Please log in to subscribe to LorenzoBernini's postings.
Posted on 07-26-08 5:33
AM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
Thanx uniscom and helpless. This stupid Lorenzo was just recalling college physics ... and its been long time. Now I got how it works.
|
|
|
CT.
Please log in to subscribe to CT.'s postings.
Posted on 07-26-08 6:47
AM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
There is one study done by world bank in Nepal, which has concluded that, we can have cheaper, reliable and risk-free electricity from coal plant in Nepal than hydroplant. For this, we need to purchase coal from bihar and build powerplants in biratnagar to birgunj belt. The only problem is the environmental pollution. But, for a poor country like Nepal, environment should not be an issue. Our whole country's pollution level will be less than 5% of Mumbai city even if we line up with coal plant throughout in our terai belt for electricity generation.
|
|
|
uniscom
Please log in to subscribe to uniscom's postings.
Posted on 07-26-08 6:57
AM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
one more thing; if safety during using electricity appliences is excluded, higher voltage lines are better than lower ones . i mean power supply of 230V is better than 120V. here is the reason: from wikkipedia: Electrical power is always partially lost by transmission. This applies to short distances such as between components on a printed circuit board
as well as to cross country high voltage lines. The major component of
power loss is due to ohmic losses in the conductors and is equal to the
product of the square of the current and the resistance of the wire:
For a system which delivers a power, P, at unity power factor at a particular voltage, V, the current flowing through the cables is given by . Thus, the power lost in the lines,
Therefore, the power lost is proportional to the resistance and
inversely proportional to the square of the voltage. A higher
transmission voltage reduces the current and thus the power lost during
transmission.
In addition, a low resistance is desirable in the cable. While copper cable could be used, aluminium
alloy is preferred due to its much better conductivity to weight ratio
making it lighter to support, as well as its lower cost. The aluminium
is normally mechanically supported on a steel core. link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electric_power_transmission
|
|