Hey Guys,

  I got an issue....My fore skin in still attached to the head of penis.I don't know if its a problem or not or if it brings any problem.Last time I had a sex with a foreign gurl,she was surprised seeing that.I thought it was normal but she told me that it may cause problem and even reduces sensastion.At that time, I used condom so it was just a normal experience for me.Later,she took my penis and she tried to force the skin backward,it hurted me so badly.....Guys, u may think its a story....but i m damn serious....so,wat would be the best way to detach the foreskin?

I got one word for you: circumcision

Don worry brother!

But u need to take care of the following things

1. Yes ur gf was right it may pose a problem ahead

2. Its benign condition called Phimosis in which the foreskin of the penis still remains attached with the glans. There are various degress of Phimosis and ur seems to be of less severe type. Severe degrees of phimosis may cause problems with urination.

3. Do not try to forcibly pull ur foreskin back in an attempt to release it. It may cause another problem Paraphimosis which more dangerous.

4. But u can try with gentle traction. Really be gentle. But i think it will not work because ita natural thing to occur on its own

5. Why don u consult a primary care physician who can refer u to a surgeon if surgery is needed (hope u r in US). If u r in nepal u can straight away consult a surgeon

6. If surgery is needed u need to undergo Circumcision: its a minor operation. And infact circumcision is more healthy. And u will be fit within a week or so and u will enjoy with ur gf lot more and she too!!

6. If u r worried then go see a doctor!

haha that story is kinda funny, disgusting ..

 

but i feel for ya man..

 

 i dont think what u are describing is normal..

 

Latoboy:

You are surcastic or silly or staburn, you may not have this problem. I have seen closely. He had problem during urination.  In muslim they do circumcision  it as a part of religion. The problem with them is who ever born with open end has to go through the circumcision.

Just follow the NEPali NEpali. For healthier and good sexual life go for circumcision.

Is that a problem?I didn't know that.Hindus donot practice circumcision,so I thought it was normal among the males.I can definitely say there are lots of males who are married,pretty happy with the sexual life and never have any kinds of problems but still have the skin attached.You may face the problem abut the sensation,i m not sure but other than that it should have be normal(i m not sure,take others suggestion.its just my hypothesis)

 And a question buzzing in mind,how the foreskin gets detached of hindu guys if they are never circumcised?Does sex have any relation with that?

Oh yeah i remember, one of my friend in Nepal had that problem and he had a surgery. But he was in Grade 7 at that time, so i am not sure if he had that problem way ahead of time or you are having problem in quite later stage.

That makes sense.We Nepali don't practice circumcision at all and we don't care about that.I have heard the advantages of circumcision but I don't think, its sth compulsory for all guys.I m not an expert on this so lets see how other people responds?

I found this on a blog and thought interesting .

Nothing on this earth disgusts and revolts me more than circumcision. Why the US and Canada (well, US mostly) are the ONLY COUNTRIES IN THE WORLD to routinely circumcise for non-religious and non-medical reasons is beyond my imagination.

Why would anyone remove part of a healthy infant's body without their permission and for no reason is disgusting.

Why? So he looks like daddy?
Please. Unless he was born with an abnormally large dick and pubic hair, this makes no sense.

Why? Because of the slight possibility an infection might occur with the foreskin?
Might as well start hacking out tonsils and appendixes at birth too, since the rate of infection with those later in life is much higher. Might as well chop off every prepubescent girl's breasts to avoid the chance of breast cancer later.

Why? Because it's easier to "do it now than later"?
How do you know it'll be needed later? Or he'll want to remove it later? Don't parents realize an adult will get much better anesthetic than an infant?

Why? Because it's just easier now?
Yeah, performing an amputation without a patient's permission is pretty damn easy.

Why? Because you think it's ugly?
Best excuse ever. Way to call your baby's gentitalia "ugly". Stop placing your sexual preferences on your newborn baby, douchebag.

Why? Because he may get made fun of?
Considering that only 11% of newborn boys were circumcised in Canada in 2003, I doubt that. And if a kid was staring at one of my son's penises in the locker room I'd have better questions.

Why? Because you have to clean it?
A foreskin is wash and wear until it retracts. Jayden's hasn't even yet. And when it does it will probably take me 10 minutes to show him how to pull it back and wipe in the bath. OHHHHHH THE WORK.

Why? Because you think it's cleaner?
A dirty circumcised cock and a dirty uncircumcised cock are equally vomit-worth and both need to be cleaned. It's not difficult to teach basic hygiene.

Why? Because a girl might not like it?
Why would you want him to be with someone who would say that? Somehow, someway, men in Australia and Europe, where almost NO ONE is circumcised, are still getting laid.



Babies are born with a foreskin for a reason. just because we are allowed to do what we want to with our child's penis doesn't mean it is right. Leave it the fck alone. If you could ask your baby if he wanted to be circumcised, what do you think he'd say?